News

Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP Attorneys Present for the MASC/MASS 2021 Joint Conference

 

Attorneys Mary Ellen Sowyrda and Vineesha Sow from Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP were invited to speak at this years’ joint conference with the Massachusetts Association of School Committees (MASC) and the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (MASS). Their topic, titled “Coping with COVID: A Discussion of Legal and Special Education Issues Impacting Schools and Students, Resulting from the Pandemic”, focused on the progress over the past twelve months, new challenges, medical “excusals”, determining compensatory services, ongoing special education considerations, the collaboration with general education teachers to ensure provision of FAPE in least restrictive environments, and dealing with unilateral placements. Attorneys Sowyrda and Sow stressed the importance of remembering to write IEP’s when students have left and are “out of sight, but not out of mind.” They then went on to outline some recent BSEA decisions addressing unilateral placement issues. These cases included Lincoln Public Schools, where a parents’ unilateral placement was denied, and they cited the school’s unapproved status and failure to adhere to special education requirements. As well as Ruth and Marshfield Public Schools, the parents’ unilateral placement was denied but is currently on appeal. Finally, Hamilton Wenham Regional Schools, where the parents’ ongoing refusal to allow the district to evaluate the student’s significantly delayed IEP and placement process resulted in the parents’ unilateral placement being denied at two different schools.

 

Mary Ellen Sowyrda is a partner in the firm and heads the Special Education Department within Murphy, Hesse, Toomey and Lehane, LLP.  The firm currently represents more than 125 school districts and educational collaboratives in the practice area of Special Education Law.  She is involved in all aspects of litigation and alternative dispute resolution at the Bureau of Special Education Appeals, including representing clients at hearings, settlement conferences, pre-hearing conferences and mediations.  She provides clients with daily advice on school-related legal issues including all aspects of special education, Section 504, student discipline, student records and anti-bullying laws, and deals with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and other state agencies that are associated with the provision of special education services to students.

 

Ms. Sow is an attorney in the firm’s Education Law and Special Education Law Groups.  Prior to coming to Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP, she held positions, representing indigent clients in special education matters, and providing mental health advocacy to children with complex mental health needs. As part of Ms. Sow’s work in education law she has provided several trainings in the areas of special education, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, school discipline and bullying/cyberbullying to medical and mental health professionals, public school districts, and community service agencies throughout Massachusetts. She has lectured at Harvard Law School and Boston College Law School on the topic of system-involved youth and the impact of special education and school discipline laws on this population. Ms. Sow is an Adjunct Professor at Bunker Hill Community College where she teaches Legal Research and Writing.

Latest News

Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP Client Granted Special Permit for Church Rectory Conversion

  A Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP client was unanimously granted a special permit by the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow the conversion of the St. Joseph-St. Therese Church rectory into a group residence facility for young women. The owners of the building, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fall River, are represented by Attorney Peter McNulty from MHTL. The rectory building originally closed in October 2021, and was used to house Parrish priests. Mr. McNulty reported that the Read More

Legal Updates

The Supreme Court Blocks OSHA Vaccination and Testing Requirements but Upholds HHS Vaccination Requirements

On January 13, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued a “stay” that prevents OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) from taking effect for the time being. On the same day, the Supreme Court also issued a “stay” that allows the Health and Human Services (“HHS”) mandatory COVID-19 vaccination rule for all Medicare and Medicaid funded facilities to go into effect. Given that both of these rulings involved applications for preliminary or emergency relief, neither of them represents the final word on the enforceability of the vaccine and/or testing mandates, and additional litigation is a certainty as the lower courts further evaluate the legality of the mandates.

Quincy, MA

Crown Colony Plaza
300 Crown Colony Drive, Suite 410
P.O. Box 9126
Quincy, MA 02169-9126

Boston, MA

75-101 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110

Tel: (617) 479-5000
Tel: (888) 841-4850
Fax: (617) 479-6469

Springfield, MA

One Monarch Place, Suite 1310R
Springfield, MA 01144

© 2022 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Website by Interactive Palette