Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP Partner Awarded Favorable Decision in Arbitrability
Attorney Michael Maccaro, a Partner at Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP, represented the City of Methuen on an arbitrability issue, and was awarded a favorable decision on June 23, 2021. The issue, brought forth by the opposing party, pertained to the grievance concerning the layoff of three permanent intermittent officers. On July 8, 2020, the three grievants, all hired by the City pursuant to Ch. 201 of the Acts of 1945, were informed by written notice that the City would be laying them off effective July 31, 2020. A grievance was later filed by the Union on August 3, 2020. The Arbitrator assigned to the case directed the parties to file briefs on arbitrability for his review.
The Union made several arguments against the City in an effort to prove the grievance is substantively arbitrable. Among those arguments they emphasized that the City voted to rescind the provisions of Ch. 201 in February 2021. However, since that occurred after the separation of employment and has yet to be finalized, Ch. 201 remains in force and effect. Additionally, the Union argues that the grievants should fall under the purview of the collecting bargaining unit, but permanent intermittent officers are not referenced in said bargaining unit; therefore, they fall under the purview of Ch. 201 of the Acts of 1945, which states “Any ember of said permanent intermittent police force may be removed by the selectmen at any time for any reason satisfactory to them…” This statement still applies to the City because although they are governed by a city council instead of a board of selectmen, they converted governance from a town to a city and Ch. 201 has the ability to pass to the new form of government. After reviewing both parties’ briefs, the Arbitrator found the Union’s arguments to be without merit, and awarded the following: “The grievance concerning the separation from employment of three permanent intermittent police officers from the City of Methuen is not substantively arbitrable.”
Michael Maccaro’s practice is focused on the areas of labor and employment in the public and private sector, litigation, and employee benefits. Prior to joining Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP, Mr. Maccaro served as Associate General Counsel for a large public sector labor union. He has litigated numerous matters, negotiated hundreds of contracts and has argued before various state courts, appellate courts, and administrative agencies throughout New England. Mr. Maccaro has served as an Adjunct Professor at the Massachusetts School of Law where he has taught legal writing and appellate advocacy. He is the 2019 recipient of the Cushing-Gavin Award for excellence in providing management labor relations legal counsel. Attorney Maccaro is also involved with training new lawyers on arbitration best practices. He graduated from Bates College in 1996 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Chemistry and received his Juris Doctor in 2004 from Northeastern University School of Law.
Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP, Partner Katherine Hesse gave a plenary presentation on Recent Developments in ERISA on Friday September 16 to members of the Group Legal Services Association (“GLSA”) at its annual meeting in New Orleans. Among the topics she emphasized were what employers/plan sponsors need to know in the aftermath of the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade and lessons from the Court’s decision in Hughes and other class action litigation as to factors to consider Read More
On August 12, 2022, Governor Charlie Baker signed S. 3096, “An act relative to equity in the cannabis industry,” (“Act”) into law. The Act reforms Massachusetts’s existing marijuana laws, particularly with respect to host community agreements (“HCAs”), community impact fees (“CIFs”), and social consumption sites (e.g. marijuana cafes). The Act empowers the Cannabis Control Commission (“Commission”), the state regulatory agency, to exert greater control over HCAs and their CIFs. Municipalities levy CIFs on cannabis businesses to account for the costs they impose on the municipality as a result of their operations. Additionally, the Act allows municipalities to permit on-premises social consumption of marijuana at designated sites. Other notable provisions of the Act include the new Social Equity Trust Fund (“Trust Fund”), changes to the tax law regarding cannabis businesses, and various provisions concerning those persons and communities most impacted by the prior illegality of marijuana usage and sale. Governor Baker vetoed only one section of the final bill: the provision calling on the state to conduct a study of medical marijuana usage in schools.