 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 
Home
> News &
Publications > Client Alert
December 1, 2003
MHTL Monthly Labor/Employment/Benefits
Update
Useful Cases And Updates - December
1, 2003
Late-Breaking
News-FCRA Third-Party Investigations Changes Approved By Congress
- Congress has approved changes long-sought by employers
in the 3rd party investigation provisions of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.
MISTAKE OF THE MONTH - Spotlight On The FMLA
“I
Never Heard Of This FMLA Law Before” - It certainly
was an unpleasant surprise to this employer; presumably they’ve
done some training since then.
No, You
Don’t Have Discretion In Granting FMLA Leave -
While this case is somewhat baffling in part, it does illustrates
some of the real-life problems and pressures employers can run
into with the FMLA.
FUNNY BONE CASE OF THE MONTH
Maybe It
Was A Stale Bagel - An employee claimed discrimination
after being terminated for attacking a co-worker with a bagel
which reportedly left the co-worker with a swollen forearm.
OTHER EMPLOYMENT LAW HEADLINES
Camera
Cell Phones At Work, Or “Hey, How Did I Get On The Internet?”
- A new potential workplace problem appears.
Termination For
Violation Of Last Chance Agreement Was Not Disability Discrimination
- It was not disability discrimination to terminate an employee
for violation of his fourth Last Chance Agreement. These agreements
do not in and of themselves violate the ADA.
Going Fishing
Is Not Necessarily A Vacation - There was a legitimate
business purpose for the company’s yearly fishing trip,
so the IRS’s attempt to collect employment taxes on the
value of the trip for each employee was rejected by the Court.
Absent “Actual
Malice,” It’s OK To Report Employee To State Licensing
Authorities - Even though the reporter was chided by
the licensing agency for filing a frivolous complaint, he was
not liable to the employee because he did not act with actual
malice.
Workers' Comp
Exclusive Remedy For Emotional Distress From Interrogation
- Jury award of $50,000 for emotional distress was overturned.
Workplace investigations into theft are a normal part of the
employment relationship, workers’ comp is employee’s
exclusive remedy.
“Significant”
Age Disparity Required To Maintain Age Discrimination Action
- Age difference of 3-6 years between plaintiff and his
replacement was not significant enough, absent direct evidence
of age discrimination, to support an age discrimination claim.
Inconsistent
Positions In SSDI and ADEA Claims Fatal To ADEA Claim -
While the Court didn’t come right out and call the
plaintiff a liar, it might as well have.
ADHD Not, In
This Case At Least, A Disability Under The ADA - Doctor’s
conclusory diagnosis of ADHD not enough to support claim of
disability, especially where employee testified he could do
the job.
How Not
To Handle A Reasonable Accommodation Situation - A case
study in an employee allegedly railroaded out of a job in a
none too subtle fashion.
Each Paycheck
Is A “Fresh” Act Of Discrimination - A distinction
between a discrete act of discrimination such as a failure to
promote or hire, and an act such as a failure to give a raise,
which recurs with each and every paycheck into the future.
SJC Rules Plaintiff
Attorneys May Contact Ex-Employees - A plaintiff’s
counsel may interview virtually any former employee, and certain
categories of current employees as well, without informing the
defendant’s counsel.
WAGE & HOUR DEVELOPMENTS
Company Liable For
Late Wage Payment Despite Employee’s Agreement - Even
though the employee agreed to defer her wages until the company’s
financial situation improved, the employer was liable under
the state Payment of Wages statute.
Fired Employee
Due Vacation Pay - This case is a good reminder to have
clear personnel policies, even though the Court avoided the
tougher question of whether or not an employer can deny a terminated
employee vacation pay.
AT THE SUPREME COURT
Is It Reverse
Age Discrimination When Older Employees Receive More Benefits
Than Younger Employees? - In this case only employees
age 50 by a certain date received retiree medical benefits.
Younger employees claimed this was reverse age discrimination.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed; the Supreme Court will
decide early next year after hearing oral arguments this month.
Supreme Court
Accepts HMO ERISA Preemption Cases - On November 3,
2003, the Court accepted two consolidated cases on ERISA preemption,
a constant topic of litigation in the federal courts and a frequent
flyer at the Supreme Court as well.
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ACTIONS OF NOTE
Status Of Wage/Hour
Regulations Still In Limbo - Amendment to bar the Department
of Labor from issuing revised regulations was still unresolved.
Senate, But Not
House, Votes To Expand I-9 Program - Electronic work
authorization program may or may not be extended.
Amendment Killing
Cash Balance Regulations Approved - Treasury would be
barred from issuing cash balance conversion regulations.
EEOC Establishes
National Call-In Center For Charge Advice - Telephone
help in filing discrimination charges will be piloted in October
2004.
Substance-Free
Workplace Website - On line help with drug and alcohol
free workplaces at www.dol.gov/dol/workingpartners.htm
ON THE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FRONT
SJC Rules Same
Gender Couples May Wed - Under the Massachusetts Constitution,
the Commonwealth cannot bar the marriage of same gender couples.
The decision may have implications for employers and benefit
program administrators.
Being Nosy Is
Not Cause To Deny Severance Pay Under ERISA Plan - Under
ERISA severance plan, termination for accessing confidential
and personal computer files accessible to any employee was not
“cause” to deny severance benefits.
Follow-Up - Contingent
Employee Status Under ERISA Plans - Two more cases rule
eligible “employee” status is determined under the
Plan definitions rather than “common law” status.
3rd Circuit Court Of Appeals Pleads For Preemption Guidance
- Preemption becoming too confusing and unfair, according to
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
ERISA Does Not
Preempt State Law Employment Contract Claim - Alleged
breach of a contract to continue plaintiff’s employment
until he actually retired, and pay out bonus and profit-sharing,
was not preempted by ERISA.
ON THE LABOR FRONT
Proposed
Legislation Would Require Board To Certify Card Checks
- Legislation filed this month basically would require employers
to recognize a union solely on the basis of so-called “card
checks” without holding a secret ballot election.
Weingarten
Redux - It was unlawful for employer to limit role of
a Weingarten representative to a silent observer, but
suspending an employee when he demanded participation of two
union representatives was not.
Good Faith Not
Enough; You Have To Be Right - You have to be right
that misconduct actually occurred to discipline an employee
for his protected conduct-here, allegedly threatening employees
if they did not sign union authorization cards. A good faith
belief the misconduct occurred is not enough.
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|